In general, the work program of the Academic Quality Assurance Unit is to ensure academic quality, both in the internal and external context, within the environment of FISIP UI which includes planning, implementation and supervision. UMPA ensures that the process and results of academic quality assurance within the environment of FISIP UI refer to a management process that is carried out consciously, systematically and efficiently to achieve satisfaction and increase value of the stakeholders. In general, the work program of UPMA describes processes, mechanisms and procedures to guarantee that quality management will actually be implemented in accordance with standards, norms, requests and satisfaction of stakeholders referring to the 2020-2025 RPJM (Medium-Term Development Plan) of UI and its derivatives that exist in the vision and mission of the work program of the dean of FISIP UI for the 2020-2025 working period. By referring to RPJM UI which has been published in the work program of the Dean of FISIP UI for the 2020-2025 working period, the Work Program of UMPA and KDA FISIP UI for the 2022-2025 period will cover two general areas; they are internal work program and external work program. Internal work programs are work programs whose output is reported every semester. This internal work programs include: EVISEM, EVITAH, EDOM, and POB. In the process, in ensuring internal academic quality, UPMA and KDA will coordinate with related Departments and Study Programs. Meanwhile, external work programs include national accreditation, international accreditation and AIA. In the process, in assuring external academic quality, UPMA and KDA will coordinate with related units at FISIP UI (the dean, HR, Finance, Student Affairs), departments, study programs, BPMA, other faculties and UI.
Based on the Decree of the Rector Number 2868/UN2.F9.D/OTL.00/2022, the Academic Quality Assurance Unit and the Accreditation Data Office in carrying out their duties are under the Dean. The Internal Organizational Structure of UPMA and KDA since 2022 is as follows:
Name | Position |
Endah Triastuti, M.Si., Ph.D | Head of UPMA and KDA |
Sri Agung Mulyaningsih | Education Data Manager 1 of UPMA and KDA |
Siti Akbariningsih Kencanawatini | Data Processing and Quality Assurance |
Yuningsih | Secretary Manager 1 |
The Academic Quality Assurance Unit and Accreditation Data Office are in charge with carrying out Quality Assurance for the Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, University of Indonesia through the Internal Quality Assurance system (SPMI) of UI, carrying out regular Evaluations of the effectiveness and efficiency of all academic activities and overseeing the preparations of external quality assurance
The quality assurance system is carried out at all levels starting from departments/study programs to the university. The legality of the quality assurance system is the Regulation of Rector Number 009 of 2016. In article 10 of the Regulation of Rector it is emphasized that academic quality assurance is carried out from the university, faculty and Department/Study Program levels. The quality assurance institution at the university level is the Academic Quality Assurance Agency (BPMA). Quality assurance at the faculty level is the Academic Quality Assurance Unit (UPMA), and at the Department/study program level is the Academic Quality Assurance Team (TPMA). The quality assurance system can be categorized into two types. First, internal quality assurance. The quality assurance is carried out through internal evaluations (Faculties and University) which are very comprehensive, covering administrative, personnel, teaching quality, lecturers and performance aspects. Second, external quality assurance. Evaluations are carried out by national and international institutions. For national institutions, it is carried out by the Board of National Accreditation for Higher Education (BAN-PT) while for international institutions, accreditation is carried out by the ASEAN University Network (ASEAN AUN-QA). Both internal and external quality assurance are evaluation instruments that cannot be separated from each other. Implementation of quality assurance and evaluation must be carried out in all units within the University of Indonesia in accordance with article 14 of the Regulation of Rector of UI Number 009 of 2016 concerning the policy of quality assurance system. The internal and external quality assurance system carried out by all units (University, Faculty, Department/Study Program) at the University of Indonesia are as follows:
Level | Name | Aspect | Executor | Time |
University | EVIN | Preparation of study programs for National and International accreditation assessments of BPMA UI | BPMA UI | Every five years |
| EVITAH | Preparation of study programs for National and International accreditation assessments of BPMA UI | BPMA UI | Every five years |
| EVISEM | Performance of Study Programs | BPMA UI | Per semester |
| EDOM | Lecturer Performance | BPMA UI | Per semester, held at the end of the semester |
| AIA | Performance of Study Programs | BPMA UI | Per year |
| Evaluation of UI Standards and Implementation of SPMI and SNPT of the Directorate General of Higher Education (Dikti) | Performance of Study Programs and Faculties | BPMA UI | Per semester |
Ministry | National Accreditation | National Quality Improvement | BAN PT | Every 5 years |
Ministry | PEPA |
| BAN PT | 6 months before the expiration of the accreditation period |
International | AUN-QA | International Quality Improvement | ASEAN AUN-QA | Every 5 years |
International | International accreditation institution recognized by DIKTI in accordance with SK (Decision Letter) |
|
|
|
Notes:
EVIN | Internal Evaluation, namely evaluation carried out on form documents of study programs, faculties and self-evaluation before being submitted to BAN PT |
EVITAH | Annual Evaluation, namely an evaluation of two EVISEMs in the current academic year |
EVISEM | Semester Evaluation, namely an evaluation carried out every semester to evaluate the performance of the Study Program each semester |
EDOM | Evaluation of Lecturers by Students, namely evaluations given by students regarding the performance of lecturers in teaching each course |
AIA | Academic Internal Audit, namely an audit carried out on the performance of Study Programs that obtain low scores on EVISEM results and other academic performance |
SPMI | The Internal Quality Assurance System is an evaluation carried out by study programs and faculties in fulfilling UI standards whose guidelines are published by BPMA |
SN-PT Dikti | National Standards for Higher Education, namely evaluation forms that must be implemented and evaluated every year to improve sustainable quality |
PEPA |
|
In general, the performance of FISIP can be seen from the accreditation results, whether carried out nationally or internationally. Nationally (carried out by BAN-PT), 19 of 20 study programs at FISIP achieved an A accreditation grade; only 1 study program (Master Program in Criminology) gaining Excellent Accreditation. For accreditation at the international level, 5 undergraduate study programs (Communication Sciences, Political Sciences, Sociology, International Relations and Social Welfare Sciences) have achieved accreditation from the ASEAN University Network (AUN). Two other undergraduate study programs (Criminology and Anthropology) are currently in progress.
Department | Study Program Accreditation Results (BAN-PT) | ||
Undergraduate (S1) | Postgraduate (S2) | Doctoral (S3) | |
Communication Sciences | A | A | A |
Political Sciences | A | A | Superior |
Sociology | A | A | A |
International Relations Sciences | A | A | None |
Social Welfare Sciences | Superior | Superior | A |
Anthropology | Superior | A | Excellent |
Criminology | Superior | Excellent | A |
Documents of Higher Education
In the last two years, the National Accreditation Board for Higher Education (BAN-PT) has established different academic quality assurance, especially in the external context. Until three years ago, external academic quality assurance focused on a five-year reporting form whose administration involved study program administrators and faculties, in the form of writing forms whose structure had been determined by BAN-PT. However, for two years ago BAN-PT began implementing an academic quality assurance strategy that focuses on student and lecturer academic activity data, as a reflection of a program’s performance, namely through Monitoring and Evaluation of Accreditation Ratings (PEPA). For two years ago, the extension of accreditation for a study program has followed a monitoring, evaluation and assessment procedure regarding the fulfilment of accreditation ranking requirements based on the provisions of the Regulation of Minister of Education and Culture No. 5/2020 concerning the extension of BAN-PT accreditation using the Accreditation Rating Monitoring and Evaluation Instrument (IPEPA), namely by carrying out two-stage monitoring. Both stages in the PEPA process rely heavily on daily data which refers to the Tri Dharma activities of lecturers and study programs. This data will be pulled by BAN PT via the SISTER page for each lecturer and via the SIAK NG page. So, it can be said that the quality assurance system established by BAN PT is now a system that strictly links internal quality assurance with external quality assurance.
Indicator | Formula | Unit | Consolidation Type | Indicator Weights (%) | Target |
Number of Study Programs that carry out Academic Internal Audit (AIA) | The number of study programs implementing AIA is based on the number of study programs that will be accredited/reaccredited/requested by the Chairman | STUDY PROGRAM (PRODI) | LAST VALUE | 50 | 4 |
Study Programs that have international and national accreditation and/or certification recognized by the Government | Number of Study Programs that participate in assistance in the international and national accreditation and/or certification processes recognized by the Government | STUDY PROGRAM (PRODI) | BPMA UI | 50 | 6 |
National Accreditation | Study Program | Status | Follow Up |
| Criminology Undergraduate Study Program | Superior |
|
| Anthropology Undergraduate Study Program | A |
|
| Social Welfare Postgraduate Study Program | A |
|
| Sociology Undergraduate Study Program | A |
|
| Sociology Postgraduate Study Program | On process | Apply for ISK (Conversion Supplement Instrument) in June 2023 |
| Criminology Postgraduate Study Program | Excellent |
|
| Politics Postgraduate Study Program | A | Apply for ISK (Conversion Supplement Instrument) |
International Accreditation | International Relations Undergraduate Study Program | SER Submit | Waiting for correction from AHPGS |
| International Relations Postgraduate Study Program | SER Submit | Waiting for correction from AHPGS |
| Communication Undergraduate Study Program | SER Submit | Waiting for correction from AHPGS |
| Communication Postgraduate Study Program | SER Submit | Waiting for correction from AHPGS |
AIA | Sociology Postgraduate Study Program | Finished |
|
| Anthropology Undergraduate Study Program | Finished |
|
| Politics Postgraduate Study Program | Finished |
|
| Criminology Postgraduate Study Program | Finished |
|
ISO | Training to recruit AMI teams | Process |
|
| Determination of the AMI Team | Process |
|
